Vortigern and the Adventus in the Historia Brittonum

The HB contains a number of dating clues regarding Vortigern and the Adventus:

Vortigern and the Adventus. Extracts from Woolf A., 13 Nisan AM 5775. Click image to enlarge.

Historical dates

31.1

factum est autem post supradictum bellum, id est quod fuit inter brittones et romanos quando duces illorum occisi sunt, et occisionem maximi tiranni213, transactoque romanorum imperio in brittannia, per quadraginta annos fuerunt sub metu. guorthigirnus214 regnauit in brittannia; et dum ipse regnabat in brittannia, urgebatur a metu pictorum scottorumque et a romanico215 impetu necnon et a timore ambrosii.

interea uenerunt tres ciulę a germania expulsę in exilio,

Fitzpatrick-Matthews k.J., 2016, ‘Harleian’ Recension, XXVIIII, XXX.

It came to pass that after this war between the Britons and the Romans, in which the generals were killed, and after the killing of the tyrant Maximus and the end of the Roman Empire in Britain, the Britons went in fear for 40 years. Vortigern ruled in Britain, and during his reign he was under pressure, from fear of the Picts and the Gaels, and of a Roman invasion, and, not least, from dread of Ambrosius. The three keels came, driven into exile from Germany.

The 40 years is the time gap between the execution of Magnus Maximus (388), taken as the effective end of Roman rule in Britain, and the arrival of the Saxons (428). It was a period in which the Britons were concerned about attacks from a number of external sources. It appears that the arrival of the Saxon exiles brought temporary respite for the inhabitants.

66.4

a regno guorthigirni608 usque ad discordiam guitolini et ambrosii anni sunt duodecim, quod est guoloppum, id est cat guoloph.

Fitzpatrick-Matthews k.J., 2016, ‘Harleian’ Recension, LXV.

from the reign of Vortigern to the discord between Vitalinus and Ambrosius are 12 years, which is Guollop, that is Catgwoloph.

12 years from the start of Vortigern’s reign takes one to the year 437. John Morris identified the location as Wallop, an element which appears in the names of a number of Hampshire villages.

66.5

guorthigirnus609 autem tenuit imperium in brittannia theodosio et ualentiniano consulibus

Fitzpatrick-Matthews k.J., 2016, ‘Harleian’ Recension, LXV.

Vortigern, however, held power in Britain in the consulate of Theodosius and Valentinian22

This entry refers to the Eastern and Western emperors Theodosius II and Valentinian III respectively, who were consuls in the year 425.

66.6

in quarto anno regni sui saxones ad brittanniam uenerunt felice et tauro consulibus

Fitzpatrick-Matthews k.J., 2016, ‘Harleian’ Recension, LXV.

in the fourth year of his [Vortigern’s] reign the Saxons came to Britain, in the consulship of Felix and Taurus,23

This entry indicates the Adventus was in 428, the fourth year of Vortigern’s reign. Felix and Taurus were indeed consuls then.

Contradictory dates

However, the document also provides alternative contradictory dates. The cause for these variations are the result of a number of different error types and methodologies:

Error type 1: Confusing AD (anno domini) with AP (anno passionis) dating systems.
Error type 2: Placing an event in a neighbouring Metonic cycle.
Error type 3: Addition or loss of a Roman numeral.

Method: Adopting 35 years for Christ’s lifespan rather than the usual 28.

2.1 and 2.2 (In translation 4.1 and 4.2)

a passione autem christi peracti sunt anni septingenti nonagenta sex. ab incarnatione autem eius anni sunt octingenti <triginta unus>2.

Fitzpatrick-Matthews K.j., 2016, ‘Harleian’ Recension, II.

From the Passion of Christ 796 years have passed; from the Incarnation 831 years.

35 years is used as the time gap between the Incarnation and the Passion (Method).

31.2

regnante225 gratiano secundo equantio, saxones a guorthigirno226 suscepti sunt anno trecentesimo quadragesimo septimo post passionem christi.

Fitzpatrick-Matthews K.j., 2016, ‘Harleian’ Recension, XXXI.

When Gratian ruled for the second time with Equitius, the Saxons were received by Vortigern, 347 years after the Passion of Christ.

Using Christ’s 35 years lifespan (Method), Vortigern’s reign in 425 may have been expressed as 390 AP, the year of the consulship of Valentinian II. However, a later scribe may have read that as an AD date (Error type 1). That there was a tradition adopting 390 as the start of his reign can be seen in the Red Book of Hergest (Llyfr Coch Hergest):

From the age of Vortigern to the Battle of Badon, which Arthur and his nobles fought with the Saxons, when Arthur and his nobles were victorious, 128 years.

The Cambro-Briton, Volume 2,1821, 218.

As Badon occurred in 518 according to the Annales Cambriae, this would suggest Vortigern’s reign commenced in the year 390.

Taking Vortigern’s reign as 390 would imply the Adventus occurred in 393. Placing this event in the previous Metonic cycle (Error type 2) results in the date 374, the year of the consulship of Gratian and Equitius.

66.2

a duobus geminis rufo603 et rubelio usque in stillicionem604 consulem605 trecenti septuaginta tres anni sunt;

Fitzpatrick-Matthews k.j., 2016, ‘Harleian’ Recension H, LXV.

from the twins, Fufius and Rubellus,19 to Stilicho,20 373 years.

Fufius and Rubellius were consuls in the year 29, the year of the Passion, Stilicho in the year 400. The author incorrectly believed Fufius and Rubellius held the consulship in the year 28. To see the evidence for this assertion, we need to understand that 66.2 and 66.3 were combined to give the interval between the Passion and the Adventus.

66.3

a stillicione606 usque ad ualentinianum, filium placidę, et regnum guorthigirni607 uiginti octo anni.

Fitzpatrick-Matthews k.J., 2016, ‘Harleian’ Recension, LXV.

from Stilicho to Valentinian son of Placidia,21 and the reign of Vortigern 28 years.


The author incorrectly refers to Valentinian III’s consulship and Vortigern’s reign instead of the Adventus. From Stilicho’s consulship year as 400, there is indeed 28 years to the Adventus.

66.7

quadringentesimo610 anno ab incarnatione612 domini nostri iesu christi.

Fitzpatrick-Matthews k.j., 2016, ‘Harleian’ Recension H, LXV.

[the Saxons came to Britain] in the four hundredth year from the incarnation24 of our lord Jesus Christ.

This dating of the Adventus was the result of replacing passion by incarnation (Error type 1).

66.8

ab anno quo saxones uenerunt in brittanniam et guorthigirno suscepti sunt usque ad decium et ualerianum, anni sunt sexaginta nouem.

Latin Fitzpatrick-Matthews k.j., 2016, 66.

From the year in which the Saxons came to Britain and Vortigern welcomed them to Decius and Valerian25 are 69 years.

There has been a long-standing issue of the identification of the name Decius. As Dumville suggested, Decius was an error for Aecius/Aëtius. However, a possibly more plausible explanation of the above quote than his suggestion is offered here. The consulship of Gratian and Equitius, incorrectly ascribed to the year of the Adventus according to 31.2, was 58 years earlier than that of Aëtius and Valerius, in 432. It is proposed that luiii became corrupted to lxix.

Observations

  1. Most of the entries with historically dates appear in the block 66.4 to 66.6.
  2. 35 years for Christ’s lifespan occur in 2.1 and 2.2 together with 31.2.
  3. The use of 19 year cycle (Enneadecaeteris) in 31.2 may indicate that the HB made use of a very early annal.

The Chronica Maiora of Isidore of Seville

The two redactions

Mommsen, in his Monumenta Germaniae Historica, believed the two redactions of the Chronica Maiora were the result of modifications made by copyists. In 2003, José Carlos Martín demonstrated that Jacques Fontaine’s assertion that there were indeed two versions. The former author dated one version from 615/616 during king Sisebut’s reign, and the other longer one from 626 under king Swinthila. His epitome, the Chronica Minora in the Etymologiae, derives from the later version.

Fig. 1. Excerpt from the two redactions of Chronica Maiora. Koon S., Wood J., 2008.

Date of Christ’s birth derived from the Chronica Maiora

It is evident that the AM date (anno mundi, years since creation) associated with each ruler represents the end of the emperor’s reign:
Octavian Augustus 5210 = 5154 + 56,
Tiberius 5233 = 5210 + 23,
Gaius Caligula 5237 = 5233 + 4.
Following the statement of the end date and length of rule there follows a description of the events that occurred under their emperorship.
As Augustus’s reign started in 5154 and chap. 237 tells us Christ was born in the 42nd year of his reign, it follows this was the year 5195. This indicates the generally accepted view that Isidore dated creation to 5210 BCE is incorrect as that would imply he dated Christ’s birth to 5211 AM.
Further evidence supporting this analysis is the comment in chap. 239 that states Christ was crucified in the year 5228. His birth in 5195 would be in agreement with a belief held in medieval times that he was 33 years old when he died.

Alternative date for Christ’s birth derived from the Chronica Maiora

Fig. 2. compares the historical dates of the start and end of the period of rule of rule of the emperors listed by Isidore with the AM dates he associated with the end of their emperorships.

Fig. 2. Emperors in the Chronica Maiora.

Below is a graph that compares the values of the last two columns in the above table. As can be seen, there is a high degree of correlation between the two variables.

Fig. 3. Isidore’s dating of the Roman rulers’ reigns. Click image to enlarge.

Inserting the value 1 in the regression line equation at the top right of the above graph, it can be seen that he was dating 1 CE as 5199 AM, in line with Eusebius and Jerome. Using this date together with make the crucifixion date of 5228 translates to 30 CE. This would be close to the date suggested by Lactantius, namely during the consulate of the twins Fufius and Rubellius:

Afterwards they had tetrarchs until the time of Herod, who was in the reign of Tiberius Caesar; in whose fifteenth year, in the consulship of the two Gemini, on the 23d of March, the Jews crucified Christ.

Institutiones Divinae 4.10.

Structure in the Annales Cambriae B

The table below lists the entries in the annal from 60 years before the birth of Christ to around the year 500.

The structure

AC B (National Archives ms. E164/1 p. 2–26)Dated eventYearDifference (Tag no. – Year)
[b1] Anus ante ínc{a}rnacionem dominí lx· Iulius cesar britta{n}niam bello pulsauít et vicít · Ca{si}bellano in brittannía regnante60 years before Christ’s birth.-5960
[b19] Anus Augustus cesar regna recepit ·Augustus.-2645
[b60] Anus natíuitas domini nostri ihesu christi in betheleem iude ín cíuitate dauídBirth of Christ.060
[b61] Anus interfeccio infancium
[b66] Anus reuersionis domini de egípto
[b76] Anus tiberíí cesarís qui primus post augustum regnauítTiberius.1462
[b90] Anus dominus a Iohanne ín Iordane baptízatus est et Ieíunauit et temptatus est ·
[b91] Anus aquam ín vínum mutauít dominus eodem die quo baptizatus est reuoluto anno
[b92] Anus dominus publice predicat Iohannes baptista obiit
[b93] Anus passionis domini nostri ihesu christi ·Passion of Christ.3360
[b99] Anus Gaicesarís · Matheus ewangelium scripsít
[b100] Anus claudi neronís · Petrus romam · marcus alexandriam petítClaudius.4159
[b114] Anus Calui neronís sub quo petrus crucífigitur · paulus gladio tra · diturNero.5460
[b128] Anus vespasianus regnauítVespasian.6959
[b129] Anus Ierosolímam díruítSiege of Jerusalem.7059
[b138] Anus tití ímperatorís · hic pius et facundus fuit ·Titus.7959
[b139] Annus domícianus Regnauit · Iohannes ewangelista intra pathmos relegatur · Clemens ín pontos exulat ·Domitian.8158
[b154] Anus Nerwe ímperatorís Iohannes ephesum redíens ewangelium scripsít ·Nerva.9658
[b155] Anus traíanus regnauit · Simon cleophe filius crucifígitur et requiescít Iohannes apostolus ·Trajan.9857
[b174] Anus Adriani imperatorís · Aquila interpres habeturHadrian.11757
[b195] Anus Antonius pius Regnauit valentínus et marcion heretici agnoscunturAntoninus Pius.13857
[b220] Anus Antonius minor regnauit Cathafrigarum heresís oriturMarcus Aurelius.16159
[b239] Anus Comodius Regnauit Theodosíus inter christianos habeturCommodus. (As sole emperor.)18059
[b252] Anus helius pertínax regnauit.Pertinax.19260
[b253] Anus aurelíí · antoníí via edicio nẏcopolíni reperítur ·Caracalla.19855
[b257] Anus Alexander Regnauit · Origenes alexandrie claruítSeverus Alexander.22235
[b270] Anus maximus Regnauit · hic persequitur christianosMaximinus I.23535
[b274] Anus Cordianus ímperat fabianus episcopus rome claruítGordian III.23836
[b280] Anus Philippus regnum ínchoat hic primus christianus imperator fuít ·Philip I.24436
[b287] Anus Decius Regnauit · sub quo beatus · est passus laurenciusDecius.24938
[b288] Anus Gallus . et volusíníanus Regnauerunt Nouacíana heres oritur ·Trebonianus Gallus, Volusianus.25137
[b290] Anus valerianus cum galíeno Regnauit Ciprianus martirío coronaturValerian, Gallienus.25337
[b305] Anus Claudius · Regnauit · paulus samianus heresím condidít ·Claudius II.26837
[b307] Anus · aurelianí Imperatorís hic persecutus est christianos .Aurelian.27037
[b312] Anus Decíí ImperatorísTacitus.27537
[b313] Anus Probi ímperatorís manícheorum heresís orta est ·Probus.27637
[b319] Anus Carus Regnauit íste de persís triumphauitCarus.28237
[b321] Anus Dioclecianí et maxímíaní · sub híís persecutoribus intra ·xxx díes ·xixm· christianorum passi suntDiocletian, Maximian.28635
[b341] Anus · maxímus et seuerus Regnauerunt Maximian. Valerius Severus, Maxentius. 30635
[b342] Anus constans et Constanus Regnauerunt ossa beati andree apostoli constanopolín transferunturConstans I, Constantius II or Constantine II.3375
[b359] Anus Iulianus Regnauit · hic ex christiano factus paganus christianos persequitur ·Julian.361-2
[b360] Anus Iouianus Regnauit · hic cum omni excercítu suo christianus effícítur .Jovian.363-3
[b362] Anus valentínianus Regnauit · qui ab Iuliano milicia fuerat priuatus .Valentinian I.364-2
[b372] Anus valens regnum ínchoatValens.3648
[b376] Anus beatus ambrosius et martinus episcopi clarueruntAmbrose bishop of Milan.3742
[b382] Anus valentínianus cum theodosío · Regnant · Ieronímus in bethleem Augustinus ín affrica predicantur Sínodus constantipolíni ·cc·l· episcopis ín qua omnes hereses condempnanturValentinian II, Theodosius I.3793
[b393] Anus Theodosius cum archadío et honorío Regnant . Iohannes anachorita claruít Theodosius I, Arcadius, Honorius.3930
[b396] Anus Iohannes crisostomus et augustinus episcopi predicanturJohn Chrysostom archbishop of Constantinople. Augustine of Hippo.397-1
[b409] Anus honorius cum theodosío mínore · Regnant Cirilu{s} alexandrie claruít . Con{s}ilium carthagínense ·cc·xl· episcoporum pelagium condempnantHonorius, Theodosius II after the death of Arcadius.4081
[b424] Anus Theodosius mínor · Regnat · ephesína sínodus · Nestoríum condempnatTheodosius II after the death of Honorius.4231
[b450] Anus marcianus imperat calcedonense consilium geriturMarcian.4500
[b455] Anus · sanctus patricius monente angelo hiberníam petíít
[b457] Annus leo maior ímperat egiptus errore dioscori latrat ·Leo I.4570
[b469] Anus aduentus anglorum · horsí et hengístí tempore wortígerní regís
[b475] Anus dies tenebrosa sicut noxEclipse 447 Dec 23.44728
[b480] Anus pascha commuta(t)ur super diem dominicam a leone papa Rome .Pope Leo and the dating of Easter.45426
[b481] Anus sancta brigida nasciturBirth of St. Brigid.45427
[b484] Anus sanctus patricíus obít ·Obit of St.Patrick.45826
[b485] Annus Sanctus Dewẏ nascitur · anno xxx post disessum patricíí de meneuia
[b497] Anus Quíes benígní episcopiObit of St. Benignus.46730
[b531] Anus episcopus ẏwor ·ccco·l etatis sue anno obíít in christo.Obit of bishop Ibar.50130
Table 1. First column from Gough-Cooper, H.W., 2015, Annales Cambriae The B text, First edition.

At the start of each entry in the table above there is a tag enclosed within square brackets. The difference, shown in the last column of the table, between the numerical value of a tag and the historical date for the corresponding event, reveals there are a number of discontinuities in the annal as illustrated in fig. 1. These breaks suggest the entries may be grouped into blocks which are listed in fig. 2.

Fig. 1. Annales Cambriae B. Click image to enlarge.
BlockFromToDifference
1[b1] 60 years before Christ’s birth.[b253] Caracalla.60
2[b257] Severus Alexander.[b341] Valerius Severus. Maxentius.35
3[b 342] Constans I. Constantius II. Constantine II.[b457] Leo I.0
4[b475] Eclipse 447 Dec 23.[b531] Obit of bishop Ibar.28
Fig. 2. Differences.

Note, the dates ascribed to the names of the Roman emperors in fig. 1 indicate the start of their reign. When several names are listed in an entry, separated by commas, it indicates the beginning of their joint rule. That the difference ascribed to an event does not always agree with the difference value for the block it appears in may be due to misdating of the event or misplacing of the entry. Where sources give a range of dates for an event the average date is given.

Block 1: As [b1] is 60 years prior to Christ’s birth it follows the difference will be 60.
Block 2: The drop to a difference of 35 years may have been due to the loss of 25 entries which might have included the names of the emperors Macrinus, Diadumenian and Elagabalus.
Block 3: The following drop to a difference of 0 must have been motivated by a wish to equate the tag no. with the number of years since Christ’s birth.
Block 4: British entries now appear regularly. The increase to a difference of 28 may have resulted from an incorrect belief that Block 3 entries were years from Christ’s Passion which was believed to have occurred during the consulate of the two Gemini, C. Fufius and L. Rubellius, in year 29.

This analysis allows us to calculate the dates implied by the annal for the events listed there. This has been done in fig. 3 for the undated entries in fig. 1. Of course, it does not follow that the proposed dates are historically correct.

BlockEventProposed date
1[b61] Year of the murder of the children1
1[b66] Year of the return of the Lord from Egypt6
1[b90] Year the Lord is baptised by Johannes in the Jordan and he fasted and was tempted30
1[b91] Year the Lord changed water into wine on the same day he was baptised a year earlier31
1[b92] Year the Lord preaches to the public Johannes the Baptist died32
1[b99] Year of Gaicesar Matheus writes his gospel39
3[b455] Year Saint Patrick having been warned by an angel proselytises Hibernia455
4[b469] Year of the arrival of the Angles of Horsa and Hengest in the time of king Vortigern441
4[b485] Year Saint Dewi is born on the thirtieth year from Patrick’s departure from Menevia.457
Fig. 3. Undated events.

Note, it could be argued that the adventus in [b469] belongs to Block 3 and consequently should be dated to 469. However, the proposed date of 441 is considered preferable as the preceding events are largely continental whereas those following are mainly insular, suggesting it properly belongs to Block 4. Furthermore, this date is supported by the Chronica Gallica.